ERP Integration / Workflow evaluation guide
Five Busy Accounting WhatsApp Workflows to Evaluate
WhatsApp can be a delivery and enquiry channel for selected Busy accounting workflows. Start with a task that is repeated often, confirm the supported data path and recipient permissions, and measure a small pilot. The examples below describe possible workflows; they are not a verified customer deployment or a promise of savings.
- Published
- Reading time
- 8 min
- Attribution
- Pending

In this guide
- Choose a task before choosing automation
- 1. Invoice and receipt delivery
- 2. Customer balance enquiries
- 3. Bill-by-bill ledger requests
- 4. Reviewed payment reminders
- 5. Bilty and dispatch enquiries
- Use readiness stages rather than a fixed launch timeline
- Measure value without inventing an ROI result
- Bring one workflow and its exceptions to the discussion
- Frequently asked questions
Part 01
Choose a task before choosing automation
An accounts team may export invoice PDFs, find customer contacts, answer balance calls and send statements manually. The useful question is where an integration can remove repeated handling while keeping accounting accuracy and customer privacy intact.
Count the actual requests, handling time, failures and exceptions for one comparable period. Keep a person responsible for disputed balances, changed invoices and delivery failures. A workflow that sends the wrong document faster is not an improvement.
Five candidate workflows and their required inputs
Scroll sideways to see every column →
| Task | Input to confirm | Result to measure |
|---|---|---|
| Invoice/receipt delivery | Final document, reference, permitted recipient | Correct delivery and exception handling time |
| Balance enquiry | Authorised customer mapping and fresh balance | Resolution without exposing another ledger |
| Ledger request | Company, year, date range, opening balance | Accurate statement and dispute handling |
| Payment reminder | Unpaid/disputed status and sending rules | Relevant reminders without paid-bill repeats |
| Dispatch update | Confirmed dispatch source and timestamp | Useful status rather than an invented tracking event |
Part 02
1. Invoice and receipt delivery
A manual path may be: create an invoice in Busy, export the final PDF, find the contact, attach the document and send it. A candidate integration can handle the document and recipient mapping once a supported trigger is available. Confirm whether that trigger is a voucher event, a checked export or another provider-supported mechanism.
Invoice workflow
Review the document, recipient and permission
A candidate accounting workflow still needs source records, an authorized recipient and an outcome path.

Document
Confirm the final invoice and the correct business record.
Recipient
Check the customer mapping and messaging permission.
Outcome
Retain a pause and human path for failed or unknown delivery.
Before sending, validate company, invoice reference, amount, recipient and document version. The sending service must satisfy the account and template conditions for that message. Record the result and let the operator correct an invalid number or attachment without duplicating an already accepted send.
A payment link is optional and requires its own approved provider and amount checks. No payment provider is activated by reading this guide. Keep the accounting receipt distinct from a messaging delivery status; a sent or delivered message does not prove payment.
- Finalise and reconcile the document.
- Map the intended recipient and confirm permission.
- Validate the template and attachment for the configured sender.
- Send through the supported service, then record the outcome and exceptions.
Further reading
Part 03
2. Customer balance enquiries
A customer might ask for Balance instead of calling the accounts desk. A configured flow could identify the authorised ledger, retrieve a checked balance and return the amount with an as-of time. If the mapping is missing or ambiguous, route the request to a person instead of showing another customer’s account.
Do not promise an instant or always-available answer. The response depends on the configured flow, the data source, its freshness and platform availability. Show when the balance was obtained and provide a human contact for disputes. Access to a WhatsApp number alone is not sufficient justification to disclose every ledger linked to it.
Illustrative response: “Sample Store East: ₹35,000 outstanding as of 30 April 2026. Ask the accounts team if a recent payment is missing.” This uses the synthetic invoice below and is not live customer information.
Part 04
3. Bill-by-bill ledger requests
A statement request needs a company, financial year, date range and authorised customer mapping. Include the opening balance and a clear debit/credit convention. Reconcile the closing balance with Busy before offering a PDF or message summary.
This invented example starts with zero opening balance and lists transactions in chronological order. Debits increase the amount owed; credits reduce it. The final ₹67,000 equals ₹77,000 in invoices minus a ₹10,000 receipt. A real statement must also account for opening balances, returns and adjustments.
Synthetic ledger — DEMO company, 2026–27; not a customer result
Scroll sideways to see every column →
| Date | Reference | Debit ₹ | Credit ₹ | Balance ₹ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-01 | DEMO-001 | 45,000 | 0 | 45,000 |
| 2026-04-02 | DEMO-REC-001 | 0 | 10,000 | 35,000 |
| 2026-04-03 | DEMO-002 | 32,000 | 0 | 67,000 |
Further reading
Part 05
4. Reviewed payment reminders
A reminder flow could use due date and outstanding amount to prepare a follow-up. Agree the cadence with the responsible team and recheck the balance immediately before sending. Suppress paid, disputed, cancelled and wrongly mapped invoices.
A candidate rule might create a review queue before the due date and another after it. These are configuration choices, not an approved universal schedule. Keep templates and recipients appropriate to the platform/account conditions, and give the customer a way to report a mismatch.
Compare overdue balances and collection timing over comparable periods, accounting for customer mix and disputes. This guide provides no verified percentage improvement or guaranteed collection result.
Further reading
Part 06
5. Bilty and dispatch enquiries
Where the source contains confirmed dispatch details, a reply can include transport name, LR/bilty number, dispatch date and a timestamp. A Busy challan or bilty record is not automatically a carrier tracking feed. Identify where each status came from.
Expected delivery dates and current location require an appropriate source. If no current status is available, say so and provide the dispatch desk’s next step. Do not invent a delivered event from a document being created or a WhatsApp message being read.
Dispatch reply fields and source checks
| Field | Check before showing it |
|---|---|
| Transport and LR/bilty reference | Matches the intended order/customer |
| Dispatch date | Recorded dispatch, not invoice creation time |
| Delivery estimate | Supplied by a responsible source and labelled an estimate |
| Current status | Origin and freshness are known; otherwise show unavailable |
Part 07
Use readiness stages rather than a fixed launch timeline
Account setup, approved templates, supported Busy access and field mapping can take different amounts of time. A four-week promise would hide those dependencies. Agree ownership and proceed only when each stage has evidence.
- Scope: select one company, task and data owner; confirm Busy edition and supported interface.
- Access: verify sender/account eligibility, recipient permissions and customer-to-ledger authorisation.
- Mapping: preview documents and responses with synthetic records; reconcile totals and references.
- Failure rehearsal: test duplicate triggers, stale data, wrong mappings, unavailable sources and rejected sends.
- Limited pilot: enable only the approved workflow, train the operator, and preserve a recovery path.
Further reading
Part 08
Measure value without inventing an ROI result
Use your own baseline and a comparable pilot period. Count handled requests, successful resolutions, delivery failures, manual corrections and duplicate sends. Measure active handling time separately from waiting time. Include review and exception work in the pilot total.
Time difference = baseline handling hours − pilot handling hours for comparable work. Any financial estimate needs an agreed labour cost basis, current platform/message/integration charges and actual implementation effort. Faster collections are not automatically revenue or profit; discuss how to value them with the finance owner.
No named customer outcome, monthly saving, price band or payback period is verified for this guide. Use the pricing page to understand the charge categories and request confirmed commercial terms before deciding.
Pilot measurement worksheet — fill with observed values
Scroll sideways to see every column →
| Measure | Baseline and pilot record | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Correct resolutions | Comparable request count and resolved count | Exclude wrong-recipient and stale-data replies |
| Handling time | Operator hours including exceptions | Compare equivalent tasks and workload |
| Reliability | Failures, repeats, recovery time | Do not count accepted sends as guaranteed delivery |
| Costs | Confirmed implementation, platform and message charges | No assumed fixed monthly price |
| Collections | Comparable balances, due dates and disputes | Avoid attributing every payment change to automation |
Further reading
Part 09
Bring one workflow and its exceptions to the discussion
Describe the Busy report or document, company/year, intended recipients and what happens when a record changes. Bring a redacted or synthetic example initially. That is enough to discuss scope without sending a live ledger through a public enquiry form.
The contact route creates an enquiry. It does not connect your Busy account, apply a template, schedule a reminder or submit a payment. Confirm supported behavior and current commercial terms before enabling the pilot.
Further reading
Questions
Frequently asked questions
Which workflow should we evaluate first?
Choose a frequently repeated task with a reliable source and clear recipient mapping, then measure a limited pilot. Invoice delivery, balance enquiries, ledgers, reminders and dispatch updates have different prerequisites.
Will saving a Busy invoice automatically send it?
Only a separately configured and verified trigger and sending workflow can do that. Confirm supported Busy access, document/recipient mapping, permissions, templates and failure handling before enabling it.
Is the ledger example a real customer result?
No. It is synthetic data showing chronological debit/credit arithmetic with zero opening balance. It does not demonstrate a live integration, customer savings or delivery success.
How much does this save or cost?
This guide has no verified savings, price band or payback result. Measure comparable handling time and exceptions, and obtain current implementation, platform and message charges before estimating value.
Can a balance bot share any ledger matching a phone number?
No. Confirm customer-to-ledger authorisation, company and data freshness. Ambiguous mappings and disputed balances need a human review path rather than automatic disclosure.
Share this guide
If copying is unavailable, select the article link below.